Revisiting that open access "sting"

<a href='http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=1347646'>Image via Shutterstock</a>

John Bohannon talks to the Scholarly Kitchen about his Science magazine investigation of open access journals and responds to criticism about his study's methods: "The 304 publishers that I probed in this investigation were not a small sample of the population of fee-charging open access publishers, but rather the complete set," he said. "There seems to be widespread confusion about this point." More from CJR.

December 2, 2013

ADVERTISEMENT
BWF Climate Change and Human Health Seed Grants

ADVERTISEMENT
EurekAlert! Travel Awards

ADVERTISEMENT
Eric and Wendy Schmidt Awards for Excellence in Science Communications