As a platform for making recombinant pro-
teins, E. coli is hard to beat. This universal
gut bacterium grows quickly and eagerly,
and—with simple genetic tinkering—will
make virtually any foreign protein. How-
ever, E. coli, a prokaryote, can’t handle
posttranslational modifications; the pro-
teins it makes are often misfolded and in-
soluble, requiring expensive processing
steps to make them usable. Mammalian
cells, in contrast, fold and modify proteins
with ease but are much harder to culture.
One organism that potentially combines
the advantages of bacterial and mamma-
lian expression systems is Pichia pastoris,
a harmless species of yeast that feeds on
methanol. Being a single-celled organism,
it is easy to grow and manipulate, while as
a eukaryote, it can perform complex ma-
nipulations on proteins. These attributes
havemadeitamainstayoftherecombinant
protein industry in India. ‘‘Pichia gives high
yields of well-expressed proteins,’’ says
Harish Iyer, head of research and develop-
ment at Biocon, the first company to mar-
ket recombinant human insulin made using
Pichia. ‘‘It is a wonderful workhorse for us.’’
Pichia’s role in biotechnology dates
back to 1969 when researchers first
learned about the organism’s remarkable
ability to feed on methanol. Since at that
time methanol could be made cheaply
from waste natural gas, oil company re-
searchers were intrigued by the idea of
using this yeast to make protein-rich ani-
mal feed. They developed the technology
to grow the organism to cell densities as
high as 130 g/l. However, the oil crisis of
the 1970s, coupled with a fall in price of
soybeans—a competing source of animal
feed protein—killed this effort.
Researchers then turned their attention
to using this prolific yeast as an expres-
sion system for foreign genes. In the early
1980s, molecular biologists at the Salk In-
stitute Biotechnology/Industrial Associ-
ate, Inc., (SIBIA), in La Jolla, CA, isolated
the principal gene for the yeast’s alcohol
oxidase promoter, which is highly effec-
tive at controlling the expression of for-
eign genes. The team went on to develop
vectors, strains, and tools for genetic ma-
nipulation of the organism. The combina-
tion of a strong promoter and very high
cell densities ‘‘resulted in strikingly high
levels of foreign proteins,’’ recalls James
Cregg, who led the SIBIA team. One of
the team’s first achievements was cloning
the surface antigen of the hepatitis B virus
(HBsAg), a process that was later re-
peated by several Indian companies with
great commercial success. In contrast,
when HBsAg is expressed in E.coli, ‘‘you
just get ‘rocks’ or inclusion bodies of mis-
folded protein that are apparently not pro-
tective against the virus,’’ says Cregg.
Since then, researchers worldwide
have used Pichia to make recombinant
versions of several dozen proteins—bac-
terial, fungal, viral, plant, and human—
with expression levels comparable to
E.coli and higher than tissue cultures.
‘‘Pichia doesn’t have toxins like E.coli
does, or viruses like tissue cultures do,’’
says Cregg. ‘‘It is an excellent expression
system, perhaps one of the best.’’
Despite its advantages, Pichia has not
been widely used in the United States
and Europe to make human therapeutics.
(One of the very few Pichia-derived inject-
able biologics approved for use in the U.S.
is a recombinant human serum albumin
made by Japan-based Mitsubishi Pharma
Corporation.) This is partly because gly-
cosylation patterns in yeast cells tend to
differ from their mammalian counterparts;
studies suggest that glycoproteins made
using fungal systems might trigger ad-
verse immune responses when injected
into mammals. More importantly, many
elements of the Pichia expression system
are protected by patents by Tucson, AZ,
based Research Corporation Technolo-
gies. ‘‘Because of patent concerns, only
a handful of U.S. companies have worked
with Pichia,’’ says Cregg. In contrast, sev-
eral Indian biotechnology companies
have embraced this yeast as a platform
for making recombinant products, en-
couraged by intellectual property regula-
tions that until recently were less stringent
than those in the U.S. and Europe.
In 1997, Hyderabad-based Shantha
Biotech announced India’s first Pichia-
derived product, a hepatitis B vaccine
based on a recombinant form of the
HBsAg antigen. Earlier work by Cregg
and other researchers provided guide-
lines for doing this, but transitioning the
technology from the lab to the factory
required a major effort. ‘‘We initially strug-
gled to get good levels of expression,’’
recalls Revathi Chaganti, then the sole
molecular biologist at the company. The
protein tended to associate with the
membrane, and it was tricky to extract it
without disturbing its structure. ‘‘Even
now we recover only about 30% of it,’’
she says. Most of the published work
dealt with shake-flask cultures; scaling
the system to industrial-size fermentors
was a challenge. ‘‘We started with a 10 L
fermentor and increased it by stages to
750 L,’’ says Chaganti. From such humble
beginnings, the company now makes
more than 100 million units of the vaccine
each year. It sells the product in more
than 50 countries and provides 40% of
UNICEF’s supply. Prior to Shantha’s ef-
fort, the multinational GlaxoSmithKline
was the sole provider of this vaccine in
India, charging more than $10 per dose;
Shanta’s entry into the market caused
its price to plunge, and it now sells at
15 cents a dose.