Why Slate shuns quotes, fact-checkers

Slate Group editor-in-chief Jacob Weisberg talked with students at Columbia recently and Allan Kustanovich reported some highlights in Womens Wear Daily: "We hate quotations at Slate. We almost never use quotes. They don’t do anything. They waste the readers’ time. Only use quotes when you can’t say it better yourself." Also, "I’m against fact-checking because I think it encourages error. The items I’ve made mistakes in are when I’ve been fact-checked."

RE: Why Slate shuns quotes, fact-checkers
Written by Andrew M Porterfield on Mar 8, 2012 Blog
Unless the quote is "Fourscore and seven years ago," or something to do with a "Cross of Gold" (and William Jennings Bryan is saying it), totally agree about quotes. Mixed feelings about fact-checkers. Why anybody thought having a clueless person "not get it" was valuable escapes me, but somehow I think there IS value in a "copyedit plus" review (dates, times, names, punctuation maybe...).